| |
"It seams we may best be able to
inhabit a place when we are not faced with the additional challenge of having
to be there."
Alain de Botton, The art of travel with
kind permission from the author
Romanticism, Art or Kitsch?
Leta Peer's "Berge" (Mountains), small format paintings
on approximately two cm thick wooden panels with gilded edges, have been made
since 1999 after photographs of mountain peaks in Engadine, the artist's home
region.
With these paintings, a comparison very quickly arises with the
romantic landscape paintings of Caspar David Friedrich, for instance, especially
his often cited Kreuz im Gebirge (Mountain Cross), the so-called Tetschener Altar,
1807/08. One might over hastily accuse Peer of slipping into a vapid reception
of Romanticism - which is a direction in art that modernism has long regarded
as a suspicious concoction of nature enthusiasm, religious mumblings and die-hard
Germanism. Yet even Friedrich's pictures are nothing less than what his epigones
wanted to see in them and made them into: what they show is precisely not the
desired harmony between man and nature, not man's sense of being at home in the
world that surrounds him. What they show instead is "... appropriated and
exploited nature (as an) aesthetic landscape..." and thus consequently at
a greatest possible and impassable distance1
, a fact that denigrators as well as devotees have often glibly overlooked, the
latter in order to be able to claim Friedrich's paintings for their own ends.2
Then again, it is typical for the way Peer works that she takes
recourse to a model that is so implicated, that she reflects on the utilization
in her picture concept without denying being affected herself: the small format
of the painting is namely as much in contrast to the sublime mountain peaks as
the gilded frame, which additionally enhances the objectness of the painting and
makes it radiate out into the space.
In this way, Leta Peer's small format paintings become a touchstone
for our own relationships to terms and phenomena such as "home" and
"nature", the meanings of which were long considered certain: art can
hardly achieve anything better than that.
Heinz Stahlhut, art historian Basel
(Catalogue text from "Der Berg", edited by Heidelberger Kunstverein,
Heidelberg 1999)
1 Inge Fleischer
et al.: Friedrich in seiner Zeit - Das Problem der Entzweiung, in: Caspar David
Friedrich und die deutsche Nachwelt, Ed. Werner Hofmann, Frankfurt / M.
1974, p. 17-27, p. 21.
2 Saul Friedländer: Kitsch und Tod.
Der Widerschein des Nazismus, Munich 1986, p. 23, then also characterizes kitsch
with Broch and Calinescu as a banalized form of Romanticism.
|
|